This paper explores the interaction
between fieldworker and "tradition bearer" over an extended period of time,
in the context of an ethnographic study of singing traditions in the
southern Pennines of England. Using examples, it examines the negative as
well as the positive aspects of the exchange, with particular emphasis on
mutuality and reciprocity. It charts the development of key relationships
and the ways in which they have come to maturity and achieved equilibrium.
Careful thought is given to the role of the fieldworker in respect of
active / passive, interventionist / non-interventionist stances. Aspects of
performance, commercialisation, networking, promotion, and media relations
are discussed. Following a consideration of ethical and moral issues,
including exploitation and advocacy, the paper suggests a working model of
partnership as a way forward for future productive field-based research into
traditional expressive arts.
In 1969 I took my first steps as a
young fieldworker in folklore exploring the world of traditional singing
that I encountered on my doorstep in the neighbourhood of Sheffield.[2]
It was my intention at that time to remain detached from the subject of my
research in order to observe as objectively as possible the phenomenon I was
recording, but such a neutral stance became untenable when I first
encountered the local tradition of carol singing.[3]
It is in the nature of this largely pub-based tradition that everyone
present participates. As an incomer, I was at first gently quizzed
concerning my background, then explicitly encouraged to join in, and even
supplied with a set of words to enable me to do so. In such a situation it
would have been churlish to have remained aloof. I decided that the best way
to establish my credentials was to demonstrate a willingness to sing, and to
learn the words and the tunes.[4]
Such overt recruiting tactics on the part of the singers, who so clearly
expected an active response from the incomer, seeking both approval and
aesthetic endorsement, put significant demands on the fieldworker.[5]
It is the meeting of such demands that this paper will consider.
The notion of "reciprocity" is
fundamental to the relationship between the fieldworker and the so-called
"informant" or "subject." Theoretical understandings of the concept in terms
of power relations have been evolving among anthropologists since the
development of the discipline (see, for example, Sahlins
1972,185-275). Roger Sanjek, in his paper about fieldwork practices and
relations between researchers and their field of work, discusses, "the
ethnographic present as gift," by which he implies the gift of ethnography
to the discipline of anthropology (1991, 619-21). This he interprets in
terms of reliability, validity, and truth. In this paper I want to take a
different tack – to explore what it is that helps to build a healthy
relationship between the fieldworker and his or her associate, and that
ensures an ethical approach to fieldwork.
The interpretation of reciprocity that
is expressed in transactional terms is the giving of inducements or rewards
by the researcher (Goldstein 1964, 160-73; Jackson 1987,
267-9; Myers 1992, 36). I have considerable misgivings about this
approach, which bears the hallmarks of paternalism, such that, at the
crudest level, the "culture" of the "subject" may become the object of
trade, and may be misappropriated and exploited. The present research is
firmly set in the "home" world (Stoeltje 1999, 160-1), where
reciprocity is manifested through implicit obligation, and at times by
negotiation. I see it as a process that develops hand-in-hand with the
building of relationships and growth of mutual trust over an extended period
of time (Georges and Jones 1980). Humanity and friendship become
paramount and the researcher and his or her associates, partners, or
consultants[6]
build relationships that are both interactive and balanced (Hood
1971, 222; Titon 1995, 288). The common interest in the musical
traditions becomes a shared interest, as the distinctions between insider
and outsider become transcended or tend to disappear altogether. This
process is understood as a partnership (Myers 1993, 12-13), with the
responsibility for the integrity of the relationship lying firmly with the
fieldworker.
My own approach to fieldwork has been
heavily influenced by a tradition of folklore scholarship in the USA that
emerged in the 1960s. It represented a move away from the folklore scholar
as a field collector or armchair scholar, obsessed with a passion to acquire
texts, to the folklore researcher as ethnographer, concerned to record
context, performance and experience. Such an approach openly acknowledges
the role of the fieldworker, who is expected to demonstrate a high level of
integrity, sensitivity, and openness towards the people with whom he or she
works (Abrahams 1970; Paredes and Bauman 1972; Ives
1978; Glassie 1982). This is particularly timely in view of the late
Alan Dundes's Presidential Invited Address to the Annual Meeting of the
American Folklore Society at Salt Lake City, in 2004, in which he openly
attacked proponents of this tradition of scholarship, namely Glassie and
Toelken, for allowing "intimidation by their informants" to influence their
scholarly judgements.[7]
Three ethnomusicological studies, in
which reciprocity has had profoundly positive effects on relationships, are
those by Anthony Seeger, Steven Feld, and Kay Kaufman Shelemay. In Why
Suya Sing, Seeger describes how he taught bluegrass to his Amazonian
hosts and collaborated with them in the publication of a recording to
promote their culture (Seeger 1987, 19-23). Feld's work with the
Kaluli of Papua New Guinea led to the publication of recordings, including
one of the sounds of the rain forest (Feld 1982; 1991). This has sold
in tens of thousands, and the royalties plus part of the proceeds were
devoted to the purchase of tracts of land to prevent deforestation. In the
study of her own fieldwork in Shadows in the Field (Barz and Cooley
1997), Shelemay examines the ways in which she became active in the process
of transmission, while researching the culture of Jewish people of Syrian
descent living in New York, especially their hymns or pizmonim (Shelemay
1997). Her acts of reciprocity included the production of a CD recording,
writing letters of advocacy, and giving lectures to introduce pizmonim
concerts. As fieldworkers in folklore we should recognise the need for
agency; and as researchers in ethnomusicology we should acknowledge that it
is appropriate to "give back," especially where firm relationships have been
built up over a number of years.
The key example I have chosen for this
study of the interaction between fieldworker and fieldwork partner is based
on my own experience, and I shall outline briefly the subject of research
and the research methodology. In the region of Sheffield in the south-east
Pennine uplands, outside the main centres of population, groups of people
maintain local traditions of Christmas carolling, which are quite distinct
in style, performance practice, and repertoire from the popular national
conception that has its roots in the Victorian era. The origins of these
"village carols" predate those of the popular repertoire by at least a
century. The most characteristic carols, the tunes of which were composed by
members of the artisan class in the eighteenth and early nineteenth
centuries, have distinctive fuguing sections in their tunes. Other more
modern items of repertoire have been added during the past two centuries,
including evangelical hymns and secular songs, such as glees. The
performance setting is usually the village pub where an informal group of
singers assemble at a certain time each week. In some communities, the local
non-conformist chapels uphold the tradition, and perform the carols as part
of a perambulation of the district. The season of performance lasts as long
as six weeks in some villages, whereas in others singing only takes place on
Christmas Eve or Christmas Day. In most traditions the singing is
unaccompanied, but some sessions are accompanied by piano, organ, or, more
unusually, by string or brass instruments (Russell 1997; 1999; 2004).
As the research progressed, my
approach to the fieldwork reflected the wider concerns of progressive
folklorists in the 1970s, moving from a focus on the items of tradition to a
concern for the processes that distinguished it. From 1970 to 1972 the area
to the north-west of Sheffield was surveyed and recordings were made to
establish the different repertoires in the key venues.[8]
This survey was widened and consolidated over a number of years by hundreds
of hours of further recording of the singing in context, by interviews, and
by archive and library research, with the purpose of investigating and
understanding how the tradition fitted into the lives of the singers and
their communities, the meanings it brought, and the significance it held for
them.
Over a decade or so of regular
contact, my status within each of the ten groups gradually changed and
developed. In the pub-based groups, which have tended to draw their
participants from an ever-widening network, I was no longer treated as an
outsider or "incomer," but accepted as a participating member of the groups,
albeit with an unusual and special agenda. With the perambulatory groups,
however, my role remained distinct. Here the relationship was one of mutual
respect; I recognised their role as significant performers of a distinct
carol repertoire, while they regarded me as their local historian and
archivist. Moreover, I found that they were unashamedly using me as a
conduit for information about other carolling groups and the carols that
they sang. They were naturally curious to discover how their carolling
tradition compared with others, both in terms of similarity and difference.
In 1973, I was approached by a
specialist record company to produce an LP of field recordings and, after
consultation with the participants, this project went ahead with their
support (Russell and Leader 1974). It was well received among the
three communities involved (Oughtibridge, Ecclesfield, and Dungworth). More
than ten years later, following a BBC Radio 4 programme that featured the
carol singing at the Black Bull, Ecclesfield, I was encouraged by the
singers to produce a tape of their carols, the BBC producer having kindly
donated his high-quality master-copies for that purpose. When the tape was
published, a scholarly basis was ensured by the inclusion of a
forty-eight-page book with a detailed account of the tradition, as well as
notes, references, and transcriptions of the words. Following on from this
publication, other carolling communities were keen to have their tradition
similarly recorded, and, in response to this demand, a publication programme
was undertaken. Ten significant traditions were systematically documented
and recordings compiled. This material formed the basis of a cassette (later
CD) and book series (see Appendix).
Besides the effects of the fieldwork
in terms of publication, there were other developments taking place in the
context of performance that were to a certain extent attributable to the
impact of the research, especially the "discovery" of significant local
manuscripts.
During the 1960s and early 1970s, in
the area to the north-west of Sheffield, three formal groups had been
founded by local enthusiasts with the express remit of sustaining the local
carols, especially the part-singing and instrumental elements, within an
institutional framework. These were the Bradfield Choral Society,
Bolsterstone Male Voice Choir, and Worrall Male Voice Choir. They were also
joined in this endeavour by a number of local brass bands, including the
Loxley Silver Band and the Stannington Brass Band. They did not see
themselves in competition with the pubs, but rather as the direct
descendants (as some of them indeed were) of performing carol choirs or
bands--such as Worrall's "Big Set," which toured various local communities.
They held large carol concerts in village halls or working men's clubs, such
as the Lomas Hall in Stannington and the Victory Club in Stocksbridge, which
proved to be very popular, particularly with elderly members of the
commtmities who did not frequent pubs. By the middle 1980s, however, the
first of these choirs had ceased to function and the focus of the others had
moved away from the local seasonal repertoire to the mainstream competitive
one of male voice choirs. This had left a void, of which the local carolling
community, including myself, was aware. The introduction of the Festival of
Village Carols in 1994 was an initiative in direct response to this
situation.
Since the start of my research I had
been loaned copies of local carol manuscripts to photocopy. As I became more
established, I was entrusted on occasions with original manuscripts, and
these have been deposited in the Sheffield Record Office (renamed Sheffield
Archives) or in the Archives of Cultural Tradition in the University of
Sheffield. One set of manuscripts in particular--those from the Worrall
families of Mount and Dawson--are now in the Sheffield Archives. These were
considered to be of great significance by local carol musicians, as they
contained a comprehensive set of vocal and instrumental parts.[9]
Up until 1950, they had been used by the "Big Set" choir mentioned earlier.
When the owner of the manuscripts let it be known that she wished to donate
them, it was on the understanding that they should not be hidden away but
that their contents would be made widely available.[10]
Thus, an agreement to undertake the responsibility of stewardship was
implicit in my acceptance of the manuscripts.
The idea for a festival emerged out of
informal discussions among a small core of knowledgeable carollers from
several communities, who, like me, regularly travelled to singing sessions
in the different carolling villages. Two objectives we had in mind were to
provide an opportunity for carollers to learn to sing parts other than the
tune and for instrumentalists to play the string parts, including the
"symphonies" -- short interludes of music between the verses of certain
carols. Consequently, I offered to make the music from the Mount-Dawson
Manuscripts available for the festival. A total of twenty-five well-known
local carols have been transcribed from this source, which have now become
the core repertoire for the festivals. The organising group felt that it was
essential that the festival should not be a concert, thereby separating
insiders from outsiders, but rather a fully-inclusive participatory event,
at which the carols could, if necessary, be learnt from scratch in a
workshop situation. It was also proposed by the organisers that the festival
should invite as guests local village groups to perform carols from their
distinctive repertoires -- an idea that has worked well. These festivals are
now well established on a biennial basis and have attracted capacity
audiences of four hundred or more.
Among the ethical considerations a
fieldworker needs to take into account are the ways in which the research
data are conserved and accessed, and how the research findings are
disseminated. This is particularly relevant for the scholar who, like me at
the time, was unattached to an institution of higher education, and did not
have answers to such ethical questions on the conduct of research enshrined
in a university policy. Moreover, it was my intention to make the materials
resulting from my fieldwork readily available to the scholarly community.
As many ethnographic researchers have
found out, it is inevitable that the client group, and occasionally also the
local media, should want to know what has been discovered. Thus, I have been
invited to speak to several groups in the region, such as the Bradfield
Local History Society, about the local carolling traditions. Acceptance of
these invitations has been beneficial for both speaker and listener, as many
members of the audiences, have been, or are, participants in carolling in
their locality, and their information, comments, leads, and other
contributions have often proved invaluable.
I have also been approached on
occasions by broadcasters and reporters for advice and assistance, to enable
them to feature the various carolling traditions in their programmes and
publications. When such approaches have come directly to me from the media,
some of the groups have asked me to act as their spokesperson. Undoubtedly,
positive media recognition raises the self-esteem of the group, while the
listeners', viewers', and readers' feedback from any resulting broadcasts or
publications has been of great significance to my research.
In view of my policy of making the
results of my field research available to the wider community, I have
organised and indexed the material and deposited copies of it in two major
sound archives--the British Library Sound Archive and the Archive of
Cultural Tradition at the University of Sheffield. From the beginning of the
fieldwork, the principle of mutuality had been firmly embedded in my
approach and built into the methodology, which I have developed and used.
Thus, relationships have developed into firm friendships, while the
publications and recordings of the respective carolling repertoires (see
Appendix) have provided tangible and
permanent tributes to the several communities in which I had carried out my
field research.
The question of royalties and profit
from the publications (books, tapes, and CDs; see
Appendix) were ethical issues that needed
to be resolved from the outset (Slobin 1992, 334), particularly as there is
an unwritten view among the carol singers that the ownership of the carols
is held in common and that no individual should benefit financially from
them.[11]
With advice, a "not-for-profit" organisation was set up to handle the
publications, and each group of participants was invited to nominate a
charitable body to which all royalties would be, and subsequently have been,
paid.
It also became quickly apparent that
the carol singers themselves were pleased to give the publications as
Christmas presents to friends and relatives. In fact, Bill Gregory
(1915-2004), who was one of the main sources of information for the
Ecclesfield publication project, would enquire for whom (i.e. which village)
I would be preparing the "next Christmas present!"
[12]
Anecdotal evidence has come to light
that the publications of selected field recordings (see Appendix) have
enabled new participants to access the repertoire of the group they were
joining -- their favourite learning opportunity being to listen to the
relevant tape or CD while driving. Even experienced carollers have utilised
the recordings in this way, particularly as an aide-memoire at the start of
a new season. Similarly, the books that accompany the recordings are
regularly seen in use by carollers as song-sheets.
The process whereby a community's
carol tradition is recorded and documented, and the whole presented as a
publication, which is then taken back and made available to the singers, has
been termed "repatriation" (Shelemay 1997, 201). This term conveys the basic
idea that recordings taken from the carollers are subsequently reunited with
them. "Repatriation," however, also has connotations of a more distant,
hegemonic, and distinct relationship between the fieldworker and the
associate -- one in which an aspect of cultural tradition removed from the
group (and subsequently lost or partially lost to them) is then restored.[13]
At none of the ten locations where the local carolling repertoire was
recorded, and subsequently published, has there been a lapse of tradition.
Moreover, "repatriation" has certain inapplicable connotations when applied
to a fieldworker such as myself who is working in a group of which he or she
is seen to be a part. Shelemay had used "memorialisation," which I consider
to be the more useful term in this context (Shelemay 1997,199), while
a colleague helpfully proposed the term "validation" to express the impact
of published recordings on the group repertoire.[14]
A more pragmatic paradigm of the function of such recordings was given by
one of the Foolow carollers, Tim Sands. He referred to the publication of
their carols as "a safety net," which would come into play should the
tradition falter at any stage in the future. Such recordings and books may
have a supportive role in the transmission of a group's repertoire, but it
is through regular annual performances that the carolling tradition is
maintained and sustained.
Most experienced researchers who have
conducted fieldwork in folklore will be aware that the process of carrying
out an enquiry in the field -- setting an agenda, asking questions, and
showing an appreciation of the material -- can contribute to a local
rekindling of interest, and, in certain circumstances, may even lead to a
revival of the traditions concerned.[15]
Something like this happened to me as a result of my own fieldwork and
publications.
In 1991 I was invited to address a
Workers' Education Association meeting in Thorpe Hesley near Rotherham on
the subject of the local Christmas carolling traditions. I learnt
subsequently that the people behind the invitation were using my knowledge
of local carolling customs to create an interest in their own village
carols, which they hoped might lead to their being revived. (The tradition
of carol singing in pubs at Thorpe Hesley had lapsed in the 1970s.) My
research findings have subsequently been used by them to re-establish the
local repertoire and to identify knowledgeable local singers (Russell
1995). The tradition was revived in 1994, and local carolling has
subsequently taken place every December since then.
The need for an ethical code is best
exemplified in dealings with the media. Thus, fair and faithful
representation has been emphasised in this connection, thereby encouraging
respect for the carolling event itself and the participants. It is important
to ensure that the people who hold the traditions are the arbiters of
whether or not media recording or filming should be permitted. Film-makers
have been cautioned against the dubious practice of "two takes," whereby a
performance is repeated in order to shoot it twice on the same camera from
two different angles for subsequent screening purposes (often causing
frustration among the singers). Very occasionally, such advice has been
ignored with unfortunate consequences, even resulting in negative feelings
towards me as the researcher.[16]
The areas of ethics, media
involvement, and relationships with local carollers have often proved tricky
to negotiate -- that is, to equate the demands of the one against the needs
of the other, while ensuring that the integrity of the participants is not
compromised (Goldstein 1964, 160-73; Jansen 1983;
Fluehr-Lobban 1991; Finnegan 1992, 214-33; Davies 1999,
45-64). I have found that the practice of consulting the leading singers of
groups in an ad-hoc arrangement and respecting their wishes may reflect the
views of the majority, but not necessarily the voices on the fringes.
Moreover, the membership of such groups may vary from week to week as not
all participants are able to attend every session, or choose not to do so.
It is, of course, the unpredictability of the membership of such groups at
the individual pub sessions that helps to build the atmosphere of
anticipation and excitement, and to create the potential for what the
participants would term "a great sing." Where enthusiasms are abundant and
passions run high, consensus viewpoints do not always fit well.
A strand of advocacy has run
throughout my work of researching and documenting local Christmas carolling
traditions (Shelemay 1997, 194-5). Part of my objective in this
context has been to enable the tradition, including repertoire, performance,
occasion, rendition, and the participants, to be recognised as being
significant. A priority, therefore, has been to give a sense of empowerment
to the carollers, to enable them to feel that their tradition is valued and
that they have control over its future. One way of achieving this has been
through the organisation of festivals, which have provided platforms for
fourteen different "village" groups to perform their carols. Feedback from
the groups themselves, and the festival goers, has confirmed that the
experience has been beneficial in promoting individual village carolling
traditions.
The raising of public awareness of
these traditions is seen by members of all the groups as a positive outcome
of their feeling of empowerment. Examples of the higher profile they now
enjoy include the regular support of two Members of Parliament (one a
minister of state) for the singing events in one village; in another, the
Mayor had formally launched the first carol singing outing in 1999; and in a
third, the carollers were recognised as "official cultural ambassadors" by
being invited to sing at the opening of the new Town Hall in December 1999.[17]
Another outcome of this sense of
empowerment has been the effectiveness of some groups in attracting new
members and thereby increasing their overall numbers: "Every year it was a
real struggle to ring round and try to get people to turn up and sing ... I
have no worries now." The success of some groups in this respect is,
however, acknowledged as a cause for concern: "Some of the places (pubs) are
packed solid and one has nearly to camp out to be guaranteed a place." There
is, thus, a recognition of the connection between "wider knowledge" and
"people now travelling a distance to attend"; and the cautionary conclusion
from one correspondent was that "over publicity will have a detrimental
effect on the tradition."
Although a request for advocacy in a
legalistic context has fortunately not yet arisen, this situation may alter,
however, as a result of recent changes to the Licensing Laws.[18]
In relation to folklorists, Steven Zeitlin has commented: "our advocacy
often takes the form of ensuring that traditional culture and the artistic
expression of ordinary people are not ignored" (Zeitlin 2000, 5). In
this sense, advocacy is at the centre of all our interests and research
activities as folklorists (Russell 1997, 88-9; 1999, 8; 2004),
although I suggest that the late Alan Dundes in his controversial address
referred to earlier would have had difficulty squaring this priority with
that of faithful and accurate reporting (Dundes 2005).
Many formal music associations and
authorities would, however, consider the phenomenon of local carolling
traditions not only unworthy of study (Sharp 1907, 125), but
virtually even invisible or non-existent (Routley 1958). In a small
but significant way, the situation is changing, to the extent that fifteen
of the three hundred settings in The New Oxford Book of Carols (Keyte and
Parrott 1992) are from the "village" carols repertoires (Russell 1993),
while the West Gallery Music Association,
founded in 1990, has enthusiastically taken up the cause of this vernacular
music through performance activities and publications (Ashman and Ashman
1998). Debora Kodish notes that her folklore teacher, the late Americo
Paredes, promoted a social activist stance that helped to define the field
of folklore (1993, 193)--"[it] documents, interprets, presents, and
advocates for forms of cultural expression that are underacknowledged or
undervalued by the academy and the mainstream media" (my italics) (Zeitlin
2000, 5).
As part of the methodology for my
work, I have strived to promote mutuality, where researcher and caroller are
on equal terms, share decision-making, and build trust in each other (Myers
1993, 12-13). Research is also shared and, as part of the writing-up
process, proposed publications are shown to key participants to minimise
inaccuracies, and for comment and feedback, in a process of validation. This
is, in effect, a form of partnership. Such a partnership model is
exemplified by the organising committee of the Festival of Village Carols,
which is composed of fourteen experienced carollers. In a recent partnered
research project, members of a carolling community at Bamford sought help on
how to document their tradition, including advice on how best to seek funds
from the Heritage Lottery Fund-Local Heritage Initiative, recording
procedures, preparation of the material for publication, and the publication
itself (Mackey and Mackey 2004).
The publication of research findings
on village carolling, undertaken with integrity and transparency, has, of
necessity, involved the construction of a narrative (Jackson and Ives
1996, xi). The aim of the ethnographer is to create order from a gallimaufry
of data, including archival information, recordings of performance events,
and personal oral histories. This is done by a stringent process of analysis
-- categorising, recognising relationships, building meaning, and hopefully
providing insights -- and all of these activities and stages involve
selection, presentation, interpretation, and mediation. When James Clifford
and George E. Marcus brought out their seminal volume on the making of
ethnographic texts, such an understanding was their starting point. We must
create such texts if we are to communicate our material; the question is how
well can this be done and does a self-conscious, reflexive stance contribute
to its quality? (Clifford and Marcus 1986).
An example of my own mediations is the
construct "village carols," chosen to distinguish such carols from the
standard repertoire of nationally-known popular carols. I recall the other
possible names that I also considered -- and discarded--including "local
carols," "vernacular carols," "country carols," "pub carols," and so on.
Certainly, "folk carols" was unacceptable as it had been appropriated by
Sharp to describe a specific form of narrative songs of the Nativity
performed by individuals in monody (Sharp 1911), perhaps more
accurately categorised as "ballad carols." In any case, the term carries a
great deal of unhelpful ideological baggage. Musicologists specialising in
sacred music had coined the term "gallery carol" (Keyte and Parrott
1992, 669-76), by which they implied a rather rustic form or offshoot of
psalmody performed by "quires" in the west galleries of country churches in
the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. This was hardly
appropriate to a vibrant twentieth-century tradition that was more usually
found in a pub or on the streets than in a place of worship. Of course, no
terms are free of some connotation or other, or can necessarily be defended
from some form of misunderstanding or misinterpretation -- not even,
perhaps, the term "village carols."
Through the publication of my
research, carol singers, especially those in relatively isolated
communities, have become much more aware of the inter-connectedness of their
local traditions. They have been able to compare repertoires, singing
styles, accompaniments, and performance milieux. They have indulged in
sightseeing visits to different carolling areas and established carolling
relationships. Occasionally, they have even learned and performed each
other's carols, when it has suited them.[19]
It thus appears that the adoption of a new (or partly new) repertoire has
been at the behest of the core carollers in the various venues and not as a
direct result of the influence of the publications and recordings, giving
rise to a process of standardisation.
One of the most marked trends in
recent years is that carol supporters travel considerably greater distances
than was the norm thirty or more years ago in order to sing at their chosen
session. Hence the constituencies of the carolling communities in several
locations, such as the Royal Hotel at Dungworth, have become much wider and
are not drawn exclusively from the catchment areas around singing venues. I
would argue that this trend has not led to the standardisation of repertoire
or style, but rather the reverse -- that the identities of the individual
traditions have been reinforced. Carollers who travel from outside a
district are generally very sensitive to local nuances and persuasions, and
demonstrate an awareness of the distinctiveness of the individual
traditions, the manner of performance, as well as showing respect for the
leaders of the sessions and the choice of carols performed. Of course,
respect for tradition and informed behaviour result from insight and
knowledge, which may have stemmed indirectly from familiarity with Village
Carols publications (see Appendix).
While some aspects of the carolling
event are performed on a more consistent basis than was formerly the case,
it is rarely possible to say why exactly that is the case. For example,
several different carolling groups repeat the final section of a carol as a
matter of course, something that did not happen to the same extent in the
past. The overall tempo of the performance in some venues has increased,
while pitch has become more amenable to the vocal range of participants --
part singing has become generally more prominent and undertaken with greater
confidence. A few items of repertoire that were widely popular thirty years
ago, such as the settings of "While Shepherds Watched" to the well-known
hymn tunes "Amazing Grace" and "Crimond," are now less frequently performed
(see Appendix 1988 [VC003]), whereas the popularity of other items, such as
"Ho, Reapers in the Whitened Harvest" and "Song of the Swale," is in the
ascendancy (see Appendix 1996 [VC009]).
I would suggest that leaving one's
fieldwork partners in ignorance of one's research findings is not a
realistic or ethical option. Moreover, access to the documented histories of
the main carol traditions has helped to demythologise some of the more
extravagant claims -- for example, that a village's or locale's repertoire
of carols was composed entirely by local people and that the carols
performed in that village or locale are unique to it. My experience has been
that their decisions, conscious and unconscious, in the performance and
interpretation of their respective traditions, are far more likely to be
influenced by accepted conventions, local chauvinism, personal aesthetics,
and a desire for innovation and variety, rather than by publications of the
fieldworker.
Northrop Frye conceived of "modem
pastoralism" as an "escape from society to the extent of ldealislng a
simplified life in the country or on the frontier (Frye 1971, 43;
Rosaldo 1986, 96-7). For Renato Rosaldo, the pastoral mode is a subtle form
of domination emerging "in interactions between town and country, middle
class and working class, and colonizer and colonized" (Rosaldo 1986,
96-7). He relates it to a civility that crosses social boundaries,
characterised by courtesy, leading to respect, but ultimately condescending
in its reverence for a simplicity that is lost. The narrators or
fieldworkers metaphorically "go native" and don shepherds' clothing, as the
distinction between Self and Other becomes a blur (Tedlock 1991, 69).
The charge of "modem pastoralism," however, can only be sustained if it can
be demonstrated that the fieldworker-associate relationship is imbalanced.
As a carol singer and participant in
several village traditions, I appreciate that I have become a part of my
associates' agenda. Lynwood Montell's comments on a similar situation
demonstrate how this balance shifted for him: "What I didn't understand at
the time was that the singers were gradually weaving a web around me and my
research efforts, drawing me in closer and closer to the center of their
activities" (Montell 1996, 123). Whereas the fieldworker may
vehemently refute a charge of "modem pastoralism" laid against his or her
own researches, no one can guard against the pastoralist (mis)appropriation
of their work. Such was the case with the publication of a highly mediated
selection from Gavin Greig's folk song collection, after his death, as Last
Leaves of Traditional Ballads and Ballad Airs, under the editorship of
Alexander Keith (Greig 1925; Thomson 2004, 206-8).
It is my experience that recognising
the importance of reciprocity enables the fieldworker to give back to his
associates, to serve their purpose, follow their agendas, and support their
aims, without compromising his or her research. Montell acknowledges this
state of equilibrium and partnership in a moment of epiphany: "I stood there
singing with the group I had come to document. There was no line drawn
between me, the fieldworker, and them, the performers. I was one of them" (Montell
1996,127). In a self-reflexive exposition of his work on Navajo Coyote
narratives, Barre Toelken concludes: "We already have plenty of 'things' to
study; what we lack is a concerted effort to understand fieldwork itself as
an interhuman dynamic event with its own meanings, texts, and contextual
peculiarities. Otherwise we run the risk ... of believing ourselves to be
the objective beneficiaries of other people's traditions which we are free
to submit to our analysis. It is folly" (Toelken 1996,16). What
Toelken has not identified for himself is that he achieved this
understanding, after thirty years, as a result of an act of reciprocity. At
the request of the Navajo themselves, he gave his paper on Navajo worldview
as part of a programme of lectures on their culture, organised by the
reservation. In response, their hatali or medicine man enlightened Toelken,
by giving him the missing piece of his jigsaw: "What the Coyote stories are
really about" (Toelken 1996, 7).
This account is reminiscent of Paul
Berliner's transcendent fieldwork moment, in which an understanding of the
tuning system of the mbira was suddenly revealed to him by one particular
associate, with whom he had built up a special relationship based on mutual
trust, after six years of field trips to Africa (Berliner 1978, 7).
Ethel Dawson's donation of the
Mount-Dawson manuscripts, as a consequence of the fostering of good
relationships during my fieldwork, enabled me to engage in reciprocation by
editing them for publication (see Appendix).
The manuscript books, formerly belonging to members of the "Big Set" carol
party, provided the key to the instrumental parts created to accompany the
carols. This information had not previously been known, as the available
piano scores were merely redactions of the vocal parts. The knowledge the
manuscripts unlocked was invaluable and helped to fuel the Festivals of
Village Carols, as well as acting as a resource for other carol singing
events. This was reflected in the weekly gatherings in Grenoside (at the Old
Red Lion or Cow and Calf) convened by Ray Ellison, who leads a group of
string accompanists. Moreover, the music contained in the manuscripts
provided a unique insight into the performance style of village bands, such
as the "Big Set." It does not simply provide an outline of the notes, as
might be expected, but details the patterning and embellishments that
distinguished and characterised the performance of such groups. This level
of information had not previously been available to scholarship or to local
carolling groups.
Thus, engaging in reciprocity not only
makes for good practice on the part of the fieldworker, but can also help to
provide the key to a greater understanding of the material collected.
In Clifford's own contribution to
Writing Culture (Clifford 1986, 98-121), he argues that ethnographies
are allegorical at two levels of meaning -- the presentation of information
about a culture, and the understanding and interpretation of that culture.
In his usage, allegory denotes "a propensity to generate another story in
the mind of its reader" (Clifford 1986, 100), a story or meaning, it
should be added, beyond the control of the ethnographer. A review of the
emerging Village Carols series of sound recordings that appeared in the
Journal of American Folklore, in 1994, described them perceptively as, "a
potentially valuable instructional resource," thereby identifying their
importance in a pedagogic context, a usage which had not been envisaged at
the time of their production (Ashton 1994, 418).
It came as a pleasant surprise to
learn that in the Ottawa Valley in Canada, a group of singers led by the
folklore scholar Shelley Posen had started their own carol singing tradition
in a pub in 1990, using the South Yorkshire tradition as their paradigm.
Posen's acknowledgement of this derivation is stated, and exemplifies the
allegorical potential of the ethnographies (Posen 2001, vi). The
Ottawa movement, with its several hundred followers, is not a reconstruction
or a revival no more than it is an imitation or a clone. It can be
understood in terms of its diasporic qualities as a cultural outport with an
emerging identity of its own. Posen emphasises the organic nature of the
movement by describing it as a 'transplant."[20]
How the Canadian phenomenon relates to its English counterparts is a source
of fascination for the Yorkshire carollers, who regard it a tribute to the
qualities of their carolling tradition that Canadians should want to emulate
it. If the phenomenon is interpreted as an act of reciprocity, it is an
unanticipated consequence of the action of producing ethnographies of the
carolling traditions, thereby demonstrating in Clifford's terms allegorical
meaning with unpredicted results. Thus the Canadians looked to the
ethnographies as teaching tools to (re-)create a music, with which they
found resonance and which helped them to express their identity.
The working model postulated here does
not lend itself to neat theoretical abstractions, but depends on the
fostering of good relations in fieldwork and the adoption of an ethical
stance. Balanced reciprocity cannot be instantly achieved but develops over
time in a form appropriate to each different relationship and set of
circumstances. It does not happen by chance but has to be worked for, and
here there is clearly a need for agency. The mutual benefits of such actions
may appear to be intangible and incalculable, as with a strong friendship;
but out of the engendered trust comes the potential for insight and
enlightenment.
The fieldworker will almost certainly
affect what he or she is engaged in researching. The notion of objective
impartial research is largely a myth that is achieved by hiding a vital part
of the evidence--oneself. Recognising the impact of the Self on the research
enables a deeper understanding to be achieved, but we are not helpless; the
shadow we cast is of our own making and our ethnographies should reflect it
(Barz and Cooley 1997). Relationships built up during fieldwork can
also be exploitative, and imbalanced reciprocity can exist. The process of
reflexivity, which emerges from personal ethics and a reasoned consideration
of what one is doing, can guard against this. We are privileged by being
granted an insight into the life and culture of our associates--their gift
to us. We can reciprocate this generosity in an active manner, both
positively and ethically. We can manage our actions and our outcomes so that
they may be mutually beneficial. Balanced relationships can grow into
partnerships, built on trust and respect, which can give rise to fruitful
outcomes. Such partnerships can create their own sense of energy, which can
enhance experience, and even lead to happenstance, the transcendence of
allegory.
Appendix: Village Carols Publications and
Recordings Edited by Ian Russell
1987 A Song for the Time: Village
Carols from the Black Bull, Ecclesfield. C60 audio cassette, VC001 with 48
pp. book. Unstone: Village Carols.
1988 Arise, Rejoice and Sing! Village
Carols from the Blue Ball Inn, Worrall. C90 audio cassette, VC002, with 56
pp. book. Unstone: Village Carols.
1988 While Shepherds Watched: Village
Carols from the Fountain, Ingbirchworth. C60 audio cassette, VC003, with 40
pp. book. Unstone: Village Carols.
1990 The Bells of Paradise: Village
Carols from Castleton in the Derbyshire Peak. C60 audio cassette, VC004,
with 48 pp. book. Unstone: Village Carols.
1992 Peace o'er the World: Village
Carols from Hathersage in the Peak District. C60 audio cassette, VC005, with
48 pp. book. Unstone: Village Carols.
1993 To Celebrate Christmas: Village
Carols from the Travellers Rest, Oughtibridge. C80 audio cassette, VC006,
with 44 pp. book. Unstone: Village Carols.
1994 A Festival of Village Carols:
Sixteen Carols from the Mount-Dawson Manuscripts, Worrall. Unstone: Village
Carols.
1994 On This Delightful Morn: Village
Carols from Foolow in the Peak District. C59 audio cassette, VC007, with 48
pp. book. Unstone: Village Carols.
1995 A Festival of Village Carols. CD
and C74 audio cassette, VCF101. Unstone: Village Carols.
1995 Come Sing for the Season Village
Carols from Coal Aston in Derbyshire. C36 audio cassette, VC008, with 48 pp.
book. Unstone: Village Carols.
1996 Hark, Hark! What News: Village
Carols from the Royal Hotel, Dungworth. CD and C79 audio cassette, VC009,
with 52 pp. book. Unstone: Village Carols.
1996 A Festival of Village Carols: A
Second Collection of Carols from the Mount-Dawson Manuscripts. Unstone:
Village Carols.
1997 Brightest and Best: Village
Carols from Beeston in Nottinghamshire. CD and C49 audio cassette, VC010,
with 48 pp. book. Unstone: Village Carols.
1997 A Festival of Village Carols
1996. CD, VCF102, Unstone: Village Carols.
2000 A Festival of Village Carols: A
Collection of Carols from the Derbyshire Peak District. Sheffield: Village
Carols.
Earlier versions of this paper were
given at the British Forum for Ethnomusicology Annual Conference, University
of Sheffield, 14-16 April 2000, and at the 32nd International Conference of
the Kommission fur Volksdichtung (Societe Internationale d'Ethnologie et de
Folklore), University of Leuven, 22-28 July 2002. The author would like to
thank Norma Russell, Vic Gammon, and Tim Ingold for their thoughtful and
valued comments and advice.
Abrahams, Roger D.,
ed. A Singer and Her Songs: Almeda Riddle's Book of Ballads. Baton
Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1970.
Ashman, Gordon, and
Isabella Ashman, eds. West Gallery Harmony: Carols & Celebrations.
Crediton, Devon: West Gallery Music Association, 1998.
Ashton, John.
Review of "English Village Carols." Journal of American Folklore 107
(1994): 417-9. Barz, Gregory F., and Timothy J. Cooley, eds. Shadows in
the Field: New Perspectives for Fieldwork in Ethnomusicology. Oxford,
New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.
Berliner, Paul.
The Soul of Mbira: Music and Traditions of the Shona People of Zimbabwe.
Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 1978.
Birkby,
Christopher, ed. A Song for the Time: Local and Traditional Carols as
Sung in Grenoside. Grenoside, Sheffield: St Mark's Church, 1990.
Clifford, James.
"On Ethnographic Allegory." In Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of
Ethnography, eds. James Clifford, and George E. Marcus. 98-121.
Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 1986.
Clifford, James,
and George E. Marcus, eds. Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of
Ethnography. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California
Press, 1986.
Davies, Charlotte
Aull. Reflexive Ethnography: A Guide to Researching Selves and Others. ASA
Research Methods in Social Anthropology. London, New York: Routledge,
1999.
Dundes, Alan. "Folkloristics
in the Twenty-First Century (AFS Invited Presidential Address, 2004)."
Journal of American Folklore 118 (2005): 385-408.
Dundes, Alan.
"Reply to Michael Evans." American Folklore Society News 34, no. 1
(2005): 14.
Feld, Steven.
Sound and Sentiment: Birds, Weeping, Poetics, and Song in Kaluli Expression.
Publications of the American Folklore Society, new series, vol. 5,
general ed. Marta Weigle. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press,
1982.
Feld, Steven, ed.
Voices of the Rain Forest. Audio cassette, RACS 0173, Ryko, 1991.
Finnegan, Ruth.
Oral Traditions and the Verbal Arts: A Guide to Research Practices. New
York: Routledge, 1992.
Fluehr-Lobban,
Carolyn. Ethics and the Profession of Anthropology: Dialogue for a New
Era. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1991.
Frye, Northrop.
Anatomy of Criticism. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1971.
Georges, Robert A.,
and Michael Owen Jones. People Studying People: The Human Element in
Fieldwork. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980.
Glassie, Henry.
Passing the Time: Folklore and History of an Ulster Community. Dublin:
O'Brien, 1982.
Goddard, J. H.,
Goddard's Revised Edition of Favourite Christmas Tunes. Oughtibridge: J.
H. Goddard [c.1955]. 2nd ed. [c.1960].
Goddard, Walter.
Walter Goddard's Collection of the Old Favourite Christmas Tunes.
Hillsborough: Goddard, [c.1928]. Repr. as Goddard's Collection of the Old
Favourite Christmas Tunes. Hillsborough: Goddard, [c. 1946].
Goldstein, Kenneth
S. A Guide for Field Workers in Folklore. Hatboro, Pa.: Folklore
Associates, 1964; London: Herbert Jenkins, 1964.
Goodison, Jack, ed.
Jack Goodison's Collection of Local and Traditional Carols. Stannington,
Sheffield: Jack Goodison, [1992].
Goodison, Jack, ed.
Jack Goodison's Collection of Local and Traditional Carols: Live from the
Lomas Hall, Stannington. Audio cassette. Stannington, Sheffield: Jack
Goodison, [1993].
Greig, Gavin.
Last Leaves of Traditional Ballads and Ballad Airs, ed. Alexander Keith.
Aberdeen: Buchan Club, 1925.
Hood, Mantle.
"The Challenge of Bi-musicality." Ethnomusicology 4 (1960): 55.
Hood, Mantle.
The Ethnomusicologist. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.
Ives, Edward D. Joe
Scott. The Woodsman-Songmaker. Urbana, Chicago, London: University of
Illinois Press, 1978.
Jackson, Bruce.
Fieldwork. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1987.
Jackson, Bruce, and
Edward D. Ives. The World Observed: Reflections on the Fieldwork Process.
Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1996.
Jansen, Wm. Hughes.
"Ethics and the Folklorist." In Handbook of American Folklore, ed.
Richard M. Dorson. 533-9. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1983.
Keyte, Hugh, and
Andrew Parrott, eds. The New Oxford Book of Carols. Oxford, New York:
Oxford University Press, 1992.
Kodish, Debora.
"Coming of Age in the Sixties." Western Folklore 52 (1993): 193-207.
Mackey, Joanna, and
Peter, Mackey. It Was Christmas to Us: Carol Singing in Bamford through
the 20th Century (with accompanying CD). Bamford: Bamford Community Arts
and Crafts, 2004.
Montell, Lynwood.
"Absorbed in Gospel Music." In The World Observed: Reflections on the
Fieldwork Process, eds. Bruce Jackson, and Edward D. Ives. 118-27.
Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1996.
Myers, Helen.
"Fieldwork." In Ethnomusicology: An Introduction, ed. Helen Myers.
21-49. New Grove Handbooks in Music. London: Macmillan, 1992.
Myers, Helen.
"introduction." In Ethnomusicology: Historical and Regional Studies, ed.
Helen Myers. 3-15. New Grove Handbooks in Music. London: Macmillan, 1993.
Paredes, Americo,
and Richard Bauman, eds. Toward New Perspectives in Folklore. Austin:
University of Texas Press, 1972.
Posen, Shelley, ed.
The Canadian Pub Caroler. Ottawa: OFC Publications, 2001.
Kirsty Rigg,
"Rochdale News: Bad News for Jazz Fans." Rochdale Online, 22 March 2005.
Available from www.rochdaleonline.co.uk/News/news.asp; INTERNET.
Rosaldo, Renato.
"From the Door of his Tent: The Fieldworker and the Inquisitor." In Writing
Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography, eds. James Clifford,
and George E. Marcus. 77-97. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of
California Press, 1986.
Routley, Eric.
The English Carol. London: Herbert Jenkins, 1958.
Russell, Ian.
"Carol Singing in the Sheffield Area." Lore and Language 1, no. 3
(1970): 12-15.
--. "A Survey of
a Christmas Singing Tradition in South Yorkshire--1970." Lore and
Language, 1, no. 8 (1973): 13-25.
--. "Traditional
Singing in West Sheffield, 1970-2." 3 vols. PhD diss., University of
Leeds, 1977.
--. Review of
The New Oxford Book of Carols. eds. Hugh Keyte and Andrew Parrott.
Folk Music Journal, 6, no. 4 (1993): 522-7.
--. "Carolling
at Thorpe Hesley." In Aspects of Rotherham, ed. Mel Jones. 155-74.
Barnsley: Wharncliffe Publishing, 1995.
--. "Alive and
Kicking: The Living Tradition of English 'Gallery' Music." In The Gallery
Tradition: Aspects of Georgian Psalmody, ed. by Christopher Turner.
81-9. Ketton: SG Publishing with Anglia Polytechnic University, 1997.
--. Liner notes
to English Village Carols: Traditional Christmas Carolling from the Southern
Pennines. CD, Smithsonian Folkways, SFWCD 40476. Washington DC:
Smithsonian Institution, 1999.
--. "Sacred and
Secular: Identity, Style, and Performance in Two Singing Traditions from the
Pennines." The World of Music 46, no. 1 (2004): 11-40.
--, and Bill
Leader, eds. Liner notes to A People's Carol: A Christmas Singing
Tradition Recorded in South Yorkshire Pubs. 12-inch LP, Leader, LEE
4065, 1974.
Sahlins, Marshall.
Stone Age Economics. Chicago and New York: Aldine Atherton, 1972.
Sanjek, Roger.
"The Ethnographic Present." Man N.S. 26 (1991): 609-28.
Seeger, Anthony.
Why Suya Sing: A Musical Anthropology of an Amazonian People. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 1987.
Sharp, Cecil J.
English Folk Song: Some Conclusions. London: Simpkin and Novello;
Taunton: Barnicott and Pearce, 1907.
--. English Folk
Carols. London: Novello, 1911.
--, and
Herbert C. MacIlwaine. The Morris Book, Part 2. London: Novello,
1909.
--, and Herbert C.
MacIlwaine. The Morris Book, Part 3. London: Novello, 1910.
--, and Herbert C.
MacIlwaine. The Morris Book, 2nd ed., Part 3. London: Novello, 1924.
Shelemay, Kay
Kaufman. "The Ethnomusicologist, Ethnographic Method, and the
Transmission of Tradition." In Shadows in the Field: New Perspectives for
Fieldwork in Ethnomusicology, eds. Gregory F. Barz, and Timothy J.
Cooley. 189-204. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. 1997.
Slobin, Mark.
"Ethical Issues." In Ethnomusicology: An Introduction. ed. Helen
Myers. New Grove Handbooks in Music. 329-36. London: Macmillan, 1992.
Stoeltje, Beverley
J., Christie, L. Fox, and Stephen, Olbrys. "The 'Self' in Fieldwork: A
Methodological Concern." Journal of American Folklore 112 (1999):
158-82.
Tedlock, Barbara.
"From Participant Observation to the Observation of Participation: The
Emergence of Narrative Ethnography." Journal of Anthropological Research 47
(1991): 69-94.
Thomson, Robert S.
"The Letters of Gain Greig to William Walker of Aberdeen." In Folk Song:
Tradition, Revival, and Re-Creation, eds. Ian Russell, and David
Atkinson. 195-209. Aberdeen: Elphinstone Institute, 2004.
Titon, Jeff Todd.
"Bi-musicality as Metaphor." Journal of American Folklore 108 (1995):
287-97.
Toelken, Barre.
"From Entertainment to Realization in Navajo Fieldwork." In The World
Observed: Reflections on the Fieldwork Process, eds. Bruce Jackson, and
Edward D. Ives. 1-17. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press,
1996.
Worrall Male Voice
Choir. Christmas with Worrall Male Voice Choir. Audio cassette,
Worrall Male Voice Choir, Sheffield, WMVC1, 1993.
Worrall Male Voice
Choir. The Joy of Christmas. Worrall, Sheffield: Worrall Male Voice
Choir, [1982], 2nd rev. ed., 2002.
Zeitlin, Steven J.
"I'm a Folklorist and You're Not: Expansive versus Delimited Strategies
in the Practice of Folklore." Journal of American Folklore 113 (2000):
3-19.

[1]
Biographical Note: Ian Russell is Director of the Elphinstone Institute,
University of Aberdeen, where his research is focused on the traditional
culture of North-East Scotland, including sacred singing, flute bands,
free reed instruments, verse recitation, and the role of individual
singers. Prior to this, he conducted extensive fieldwork into the
singing traditions (including Christmas carolling) of South Yorkshire
and North Derbyshire. He has also researched traditional drama, dance,
and humour. He was a former editor of the Folk Music Journal, 1980-1993,
and, with David Atkinson, edited Folk Song: Tradition, Revival, and
Re-Creation (Aberdeen: University of Aberdeen, 2004).
[2]
This fieldwork later formed part of my PhD dissertation (see Russell
1977, vol. 1, 117-40). The research was undertaken on a part-time basis,
as I was employed full time as a primary teacher (1970-85) and as a
headteacher (1986-99).
[3]
My participation was not a conscious adoption of the classic
participant-observer stance, but there are similarities with Mantle
Hood's concept of bi-musicality (1960, 55; 1971, 230-41; Titon
1995), although I was unaware of this methodology at the time. I was,
however, acutely aware of the importance of context in my fieldwork.
Stoeltje et al. have described this realisation as: "the shift ...
away from the collection of disembodied texts to an emphasis on the
enactment, creation, use or performance of folklore by specific
individuals in variable settings" (1999, 167). See also Finnegan
(1992, 91-111) and Tedlock (1991).
[4]
The decision to participate wholeheartedly is now considered good
ethnomusicological practice: "Learning to sing, dance, play in the field
is good fun and good method" (Myers 1992, 31).
[5]
Lynwood Montell has described a similar experience with the gospel
singing tradition in South Central Kentucky as "absorption" (1996, 118).
[6]
The term "associate," "partner," or "consultant" is preferred to the
pejorative "informant" or "subject" (Jansen 1983; Finnegan
1992, 221; Titon 1995, 289).
[7]
See Dundes (2005) and the correspondence in American Folklore
Society News, vol. 34, no. 1 (2005, 13-14).
[8]
The survey was undertaken for the Survey of Language and Folklore,
Department of English Language, University of Sheffield, directed by J.
D. A. Widdowson (Russell 1970; 1973).
[9]
See the Mount-Dawson Manuscripts, Sheffield Archives, LD
2440/1-4.
[10]
Ethel Dawson, Worrall, 20 November 1983.
[11]
This was not strictly true before 1960, as the main collection of local
carols, published in Sheffield by Goddard's, was used to advertise their
business--a music shop and piano tuning service, and later an electrical
appliance shop (Goddard 1928; 1960).
[12]
Quotations are from my fieldnotes, transcriptions of my field
recordings, and correspondence.
[13]
This interpretation seems to be at variance with the fact that members
of the carol groups have made their own recordings and that locally
published collections of carols are readily available. For recent
examples of carol collections published locally, see Worrall Male
Voice Choir ([1982] 2002), Birkby (1990), and Goodison
(1992); and for recordings, see Worrall Male Voice Choir (1993)
and Goodison (1993).
[14]
I am grateful to Colin Milton for suggesting this.
[15]
When Cecil Sharp carried out research on the morris dances of Winster in
Derbyshire in 1908, his visits generated a full-scale revival of the
dance -- something he did not mention in his fieldnotes or subsequent
published studies. See in this connection Sharp and Macllwaine (1909,
43-6; 1910, 12-13 and 94-100; 1924, 76-82). Copies of Cecil Sharp's
manuscripts are in the Vaughan Williams Memorial Library, London. See
Field Notebook 3, 17 April-27 June 1908; Folk Words 9,
1535-52; Folk Tunes 8, 1694-97 and 1715. Compare these accounts
with "An Old English Revival: Morris Dancing at Winster" [no
author cited] in The Derbyshire Times, Saturday 4 July 1908: "It is
fifteen years ago since there was Morris dancing in this quaint Peakland
village, and the performance gave evidence of careful training."
[16]
One television crew, who filmed on 1 December 1996, were particularly
insensitive. Their producer had arranged with the licensee to film at
the Royal Hotel, Dungworth. Their intrusive manner, typified by their
insistent requests to repeat carol performances, upset some of the
carollers, one of whom threatened them with violence if they did not
stop filming. The crew subsequently left.
[17]
These are respectively the Black Bull Carollers, Ecclesfield; Beeston
Methodist Carol Choir, Nottinghamshire; and Coal Aston Carollers at
Dronfield, Derbyshire.
[18]
Under the previous legislation in some parts of England (e.g. Bristol
and Oxfordshire), public entertainment legislation (the Licensing Act
1964, section 182) was enforced with rigour by over-zealous local
authorities. This legislation required pubs, where three or more
musicians perform, to have a Public Entertainment License, the fee for
which varied between 500 [pounds sterling] and in excess of 2000 [pounds
sterling], depending on the local authority. Less than five per cent of
pubs chose to take out a license. (Infringement could have led to a fine
of £20,000 [pounds sterling] and a six-month prison sentence.) Some
local authorities chose not to distinguish between professional
musicians hired by the pub, amateur folk musicians having a "jam"
session, and members of the public participating (e.g. singing along).
In 2001 there were two reported instances of carol singing being
forbidden by this law, in Westminster (Sunday Times, 30 December 2001,
16) and in Dorset (Sunday Telegraph, 23 December 2001). At the time of
writing, the impact of the new legislation (Licensing Act 2003) has not
been felt as full implementation is not due until November 2005, but one
pub chain (Samuel Smith of Tadcaster) is reported to have banned all
live music from its premises -- see Kirsty Rigg (2005).
[19]
For example, in 1997 Hathersage carollers added "Merry, Merry Christmas"
to their repertoire from the Eyam tradition, following a carol workshop
held in Eyam on 8-9 November 1997, which some of them attended. They
call it the "Eyam Carol."
[20]
See handwritten dedication in a copy of the collection in author's
possession.